Hospital Prices for Physician-Administered Drugs for Patients with Private Insurance.

BACKGROUND: Hospitals can leverage their position between the ultimate buyers and sellers of drugs to retain a substantial share of insurer pharmaceutical expenditures. METHODS: In this study, we used 2020-2021 national Blue Cross Blue Shield claims data regarding patients in the United States who had drug-infusion visits for oncologic conditions, inflammatory conditions, or blood-cell deficiency disorders. Markups of the reimbursement prices were measured in terms of amounts paid by Blue Cross Blue Shield plans to hospitals and physician practices relative to the amounts paid by these providers to drug manufacturers. Acquisition-price reductions in hospital payments to drug manufacturers were measured in terms of discounts under the federal 340B Drug Pricing Program. We estimated the percentage of Blue Cross Blue Shield drug spending that was received by drug manufacturers and the percentage retained by provider organizations. RESULTS: The study included 404,443 patients in the United States who had 4,727,189 drug-infusion visits. The median price markup (defined as the ratio of the reimbursement price to the acquisition price) for hospitals eligible for 340B discounts was 3.08 (interquartile range, 1.87 to 6.38). After adjustment for drug, patient, and geographic factors, price markups at hospitals eligible for 340B discounts were 6.59 times (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.02 to 7.16) as high as those in independent physician practices, and price markups at noneligible hospitals were 4.34 times (95% CI, 3.77 to 4.90) as high as those in physician practices. Hospitals eligible for 340B discounts retained 64.3% of insurer drug expenditures, whereas hospitals not eligible for 340B discounts retained 44.8% and independent physician practices retained 19.1%. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that hospitals imposed large price markups and retained a substantial share of total insurer spending on physician-administered drugs for patients with private insurance. The effects were especially large for hospitals eligible for discounts under the federal 340B Drug Pricing Program on acquisition costs paid to manufacturers. (Funded by Arnold Ventures and the National Institute for Health Care Management.).

Efficacy and safety of a Belgian tertiary care outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) program.

PURPOSE: Evidence supports the implementation of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) as standard of care. Until 2015 the overall experience with OPAT in Belgium remained limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a Belgian 'OPAT at home' program, which was implemented in University Hospitals Leuven starting from January 2017. METHODS: A mono-centric, prospective, observational study was carried out. All OPAT cases discharged between 10 January 2017 and 10 January 2019 were included in the study. Relevant demographic and clinical patient data were collected. The outcomes were clinical cure rate, OPAT related readmission rate, adverse event rate and patients' satisfaction. RESULTS: Over the two-year study period, 152 OPAT episodes were started in 130 patients, resulting in 3153 avoided hospitalization days which corresponds to 5.4 freed hospital beds. Urinary tract infections accounted for 40.8% of OPAT courses and temocillin was the most frequently used antibiotic (24.3%). Cure was achieved in 97.9% of the OPAT episodes. During 22 (14.5%) OPAT episodes, patients experienced adverse events, including line related adverse events (7.9%) and adverse drug events (6.6%). An OPAT related readmission rate of 9.2% was observed, mostly related to line-associated adverse events. All patients who completed the satisfaction survey (n = 23) were very satisfied with their OPAT course. CONCLUSION: The University Hospitals Leuven OPAT program is associated with a high level of clinical cure and low all-cause readmission and adverse event rates. Improvement actions are described to further reduce the readmission rate to less than 5.0%.

Improving the Transition of Intravenous to Enteral Antibiotics in Pediatric Patients with Pneumonia or Skin and Soft Tissue Infections.

BACKGROUND: Despite national recommendations for early transition to enteral antimicrobials, practice variability has existed at our hospital. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to increase the proportion of enterally administered antibiotic doses for Pediatric Hospital Medicine patients aged >60 days admitted for uncomplicated community-acquired pneumonia or skin and soft tissue infections from 44% to 75% in eight months. METHODS: This quality improvement study was conducted at a large, urban, academic children's hospital. The study population included Hospital Medicine patients aged >60 days with diagnoses of pneumonia or skin and soft tissue infections. Interventions included education on intravenous and enteral antibiotic charge differentials, documentation of transition plan, structured discussions of transition criteria, and real-time identification of failures with feedback. Our process measure was the total number of enteral antibiotic doses divided by all antibiotic doses in patients receiving enteral medications on the same day. An annotated statistical process control chart tracked the impact of interventions on the administration route of antibiotic doses over time. Additional outcome measures included antimicrobial costs per patient encounter using average wholesale prices and length of stay. RESULTS: The percentage of enterally administered antibiotic doses increased from 44% to 80% within eight months. Antimicrobial costs per patient encounter and the associated standard deviation of costs for our target diagnoses decreased by 70% and 84%, respectively. Average length of stay did not change. CONCLUSIONS: Standardized communication about criteria for transition from intravenous to enteral antibiotics can lead to earlier transitions for patients with pneumonia or skin and soft tissue infections, subsequently reducing costs and prescribing variability.

OPAT in Switzerland: single-center experience of a model to treat complicated infections.

PURPOSE: Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) programmes are established in the minority of Swiss hospitals. We aimed to study the OPAT programme at the University Hospital Basel during a 3-year period to evaluate safety and outcome. METHODS: All patients treated in the OPAT programme between 2015 and 2017 were included in the study. Demographic, clinical and OPAT outcome data were extracted from the hospital information system. Differences between treatment periods were analysed and risk factors for readmission and adverse events identified. RESULTS: In total, 462 patients were enrolled from 2015 to 2017. Patient numbers and total treatment days increased by 68% and 116%, respectively. Indications included many complicated infections such as bone and joint (23%) and intravascular infections (13%). Of the identified Gram-negative bacteria, 25% produced extended spectrum beta-lactamases. The percentage of antibiotics administrated with an elastomeric device increased from 11% in 2015 to 29% in 2017, whereas the use of once-daily antimicrobials (such as ceftriaxone) declined. Adverse events were rare (n = 67; 14.6%) including only two severe catheter-related events. Cure was noted in 98% of patients. 30-day unplanned readmission occurred in 46 (10.0%) patients, and intravascular infections and a higher Charlson comorbidity index were identified as independent predictors. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the successful implementation of a formal OPAT programme in a Swiss tertiary care hospital. Careful selection of patients and monitoring during treatment are crucial to avoid frequent readmissions. Hence, our data call for an expansion of OPAT services in Switzerland in the near future.

Drug reactions in children with rheumatic diseases receiving parenteral therapies: 9 years' experience of a tertiary pediatric rheumatology center.

Parenteral treatments (either subcutaneous or intravenous) are frequently used in rheumatology practice. In this study, drug side effects in patients who were followed up with a rheumatic disease and treated with parenteral administration methods were evaluated. The drug side effects in children who were followed up with a rheumatic disease and treated with parenteral treatments between 2010 and 2019 were recorded, retrospectively. All parenteral treatments are applied by a clinical nurse specialist (CNS) who is experienced in pediatric rheumatology for 10 years. Four hundred and thirteen patients were evaluated in this study. The mean age was 12.09 ± 5.05 years. Most of them were diagnosed with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (n = 317) and colchicine-resistant familial Mediterranean fever (n = 57). Among the patients, 287 was treated with methotrexate, 130 with etanercept, 90 with adalimumab, 71 with anakinra, 64 with canakinumab, 55 with tocilizumab, seven with rituximab, six with infliximab, and four with abatacept. Two of the patients had a history of drug allergy (ceftriaxone = 1, ranitidine = 1). The most common adverse reactions were as follows: nausea-vomiting in 52, rash in 11, itching in three, chest tightening in two, bruising in two, headache in two, and abdominal pain in one of the patients. Drug side effects were observed after an average of three (1-4) administrations. Antihistaminic and steroids (tocilizumab = 3, infliximab = 1, methotrexate = 1) were administered to five patients due to hypersensitivity reactions. Considering the possible side effects and preparation protocols of parenteral treatments, experienced physicians and nurses are required in the field.

Intravenous catheter-related adverse events exceed drug-related adverse events in outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy.

BACKGROUND: Drug-related adverse events (AEs) are reported to be common amongst patients receiving outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT). However, comparative data regarding intravenous (iv) catheter-related AEs are lacking. OBJECTIVES: To compare drug- and iv catheter-related AEs from a large UK OPAT centre. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed 544 OPAT episodes [median (IQR) age: 57 (39-71) years, 60% male, 13% with diabetes] with a median (IQR) duration of 7 (2-18) days. Clinically significant drug- and iv catheter-related AEs were calculated as a percentage of OPAT episodes with an AE and also as AEs per 1000 iv drug/catheter days. RESULTS: Drug-related AEs complicated 13 (2.4%) OPAT episodes at 1.7 (95% CI 0.9-2.9) per 1000 drug days. Catheter-related AEs occurred more frequently, complicating 32 (5.9%) episodes at 5.7 (95% CI 4.2-7.9) per 1000 iv catheter days (χ2 test for difference in AE rate: P < 0.001). Non-radiologically guided midline catheters were associated with the most frequent AEs (n = 23) at 15.6 (95% CI 10.3-23.4) per 1000 iv catheter days compared with other types of iv catheters (HR 8.4, 95% CI 2.4-51.9, P < 0.004), and self-administration was associated with a higher rate of catheter-related AEs at 12.0 (95% CI 6.0-23.9) per 1000 iv catheter days (HR 4.15, 95% CI 1.7-9.1, P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Clinically significant iv catheter-related AEs occurred more frequently than drug-related AEs, especially when using non-radiologically guided midline catheters. Regular review of the need for iv therapy and switching to oral antimicrobials when appropriate is likely to minimize OPAT-related AEs.

Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy and antibiotic stewardship: opponents or teammates?

PURPOSE: This narrative review aims to describe barriers of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy at home (OPAT), potentially compromising general standards of antibiotic stewardship (ABS) and facilitators of OPAT for ABS. METHODS: After a literature review, five authors determined the barriers and facilitators to discuss in this review. RESULTS: Sixty-six publications were included in the narrative review and seven barriers and five facilitators are discussed in this article. The impracticability of multiple daily dosing during OPAT, the impact of real-life temperature variations, deviations of the infusion rates of elastomeric devices, access to prolonged intravenous antibiotic therapy, not administering loading doses before the initiation of extended or continuous infusions and the transmural nature of care associated with OPAT, can lead to deviations of recommended treatment regimens and sub-optimal clinical and laboratory follow-up, with a risk of inferior clinical outcomes, adverse events, drug-resistance and higher costs. On the other hand, OPAT provides access to treatments with intravenous antibiotics and simultaneously avoids prolonged hospitalization. CONCLUSION: Implementing ABS guidelines in OPAT programs, e.g., by using a multidisciplinary team approach and facility-specific protocols for OPAT with patient selection criteria and instructions for selection, storage, preparation and administration of antibiotics, can improve appropriate antibiotic use. Additionally, further research should examine the effectiveness of these interventions on outcomes of OPAT.

A prospective naturalistic multicenter study on choice of parenteral medication in psychiatric emergency settings in Japan.

AIM: To provide information about psychiatric emergency situations in Japan, we examined psychiatrists' preference among parenteral medication since intramuscular (IM)-olanzapine became available and clinical characteristics in patients given IM-olanzapine compared to those given other parenteral medication. METHODS: We conducted a naturalistic study proceeding over a 1-year period in 9 psychiatric emergency departments. RESULTS: Among 197 patients, the distribution of IM-injections (n = 89) was as follows: IM-olanzapine, 66 patients (74.2%), IM-levomepromazine, 17 patients (19.1%), IM-haloperidol, 5 patients (5.6%), and IM-diazepam, 1 patient (1.1%). The distribution of intravenous (IV)-injections (n = 108) was as follows: IV-haloperidol, 78 patients (72.2%), and IV-benzodiazepines (diazepam, flunitrazepam, or midazolam), 30 patients (27.8%). Advantages of IM-olanzapine over other parenteral medications in efficacy were found as follows: less frequent needs of an additional injection despite no difference in duration until a patient became cooperative for oral administration, and less frequent needs of restraint after the injection. Furthermore, advantages of IM-olanzapine over other injections in safety were found as follows: less frequent appearance of extrapyramidal symptoms, no occurrence of ECG abnormality and other serious adverse events except a fall, less frequent needs of an adjunctive anticholinergic drug, and less frequent needs of another kind of drug additionally injected. CONCLUSIONS: Olanzapine has rapidly become the first choice of intramuscular medication in psychiatric emergency situations since it became available in Japan, probably due to the advantages in both efficacy and safety. This study reflecting psychiatric emergency practice in Japan may contribute to periodic international comparison of psychiatric emergency practice.

Impact of the implementation of a nurse-managed outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) system in Baltimore: a case study demonstrating cost savings and reduction in re-admission rates.

Objectives: Evidence supports the safety and effectiveness of outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT). A registered nurse (RN)-managed multidisciplinary team OPAT model was implemented at our hospital. We evaluated the impact of the new OPAT model on readmissions during OPAT and other core OPAT processes. Methods: All potential OPAT cases from 1 November 2013 to 31 June 2017 discharged from the Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center were followed up in a retrospective cohort study. Relevant clinical and patient characteristics were collected for the first OPAT course per patient. The primary outcome was all-cause readmission to any facility part of the Johns Hopkins Health System within 30 days of OPAT discharge. Proportions of OPAT patients readmitted before and after the implementation of the new OPAT model were compared. A log-binomial regression was used to compare the risk of readmission, adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, site of OPAT care, opioid dependence and OPAT treatment duration. Results: Five hundred and seventeen OPAT patients were included in the analysis; 51.1% were discharged after the implementation of the new OPAT model. Readmission rates decreased from 20.2% to 13.3% following the RN-managed OPAT programme (P = 0.04). The results of the adjusted model indicated that nurse management was associated with a 39% reduction in the risk of readmission (adjusted relative risk 0.61; 95% CI 0.41-0.91; P = 0.01). Our financial evaluation estimated that the reduction in readmissions achieved by the RN-managed model saved the hospital $649 416 over 15 months. Conclusions: The RN-managed OPAT programme was associated with a significant reduction in readmissions.

Emergency Department Revisits After an Initial Parenteral Antibiotic Dose for UTI.

BACKGROUND: Although oral antibiotics are recommended for the management of most urinary tract infections (UTIs), the administration of parenteral antibiotics before emergency department (ED) discharge is common. We investigated the relationship between the administration of a single dose of parenteral antibiotics before ED discharge and revisits requiring admission among children with UTIs. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of administrative data from 36 pediatric hospitals was performed. Patients aged 29 days to 2 years who were evaluated in the ED with a UTI between 2010 and 2016 were studied. Primary outcome was adjusted 3-day ED revisit rates resulting in admission. All revisits, regardless of disposition, served as a secondary outcome. Average treatment effects were estimated by using inverse probability weighted regression, with adjustment for demographic factors, diagnostic testing, ED medications, and hospital-level factors. RESULTS: We studied 29 919 children with a median age of 8.6 (interquartile range: 5.1-13.8) months. Of those studied, 36% of the children received parenteral antibiotics before discharge. Patients who received parenteral antibiotics had similar adjusted rates of revisits leading to admission as those who did not receive parenteral antibiotics (1.3% vs 1.0%, respectively; risk difference: 0.3% [95% confidence interval: -0.01% to 0.6%]), although overall revisit rates were higher among patients who received parenteral antibiotics (4.8% vs 3.3%; risk difference 1.5% [95% confidence interval: 0.9% to 2.1%]). CONCLUSIONS: Among discharged patients, a parenteral dose of antibiotics did not reduce revisits leading to admission, supporting the goal of discharging patients with oral antibiotics alone for most children with UTIs.

Impacts on health outcomes and on resource utilisation of home-based parenteral chemotherapy administration: a systematic review protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the demonstrated feasibility and policies to enable more to receive chemotherapy at home, in a few countries, parenteral chemotherapy administration at home remains currently marginal. Of note, findings of different studies on health outcomes and resources utilisation vary, leading to conflicting results. This protocol outlines a systematic review that seeks to synthesise and critically appraise the current state of evidence on the comparison between home setting and hospital setting for parenteral chemotherapy administration within the same high standards of clinical care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol has been prepared following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols approach. Electronic searches will be conducted on bibliographic databases selected from the earliest available data through 15 November 2017 published in French and English languages. Additional potential papers in the selected studies and grey literature will be also included in the review. The review will include all types of studies exploring patients receiving anticancer drugs for injection at home compared with patients receiving the drugs in a hospital setting, and will assess at least one of the following criteria: patients' health outcomes, patients' or caregivers' satisfaction, resource utilisation with cost savings, and incentives and/or barriers of each admission setting according to patients' and relatives' points of view. Two reviewers will independently screen studies and extract relevant data from the included studies. Methodological quality of studies will be assessed using the 'Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies' developed by the Effective Public Health Practice Project tool, in addition to the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards statement for economic studies. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: As the review is focused on the analysis of secondary data, it does not require ethics approval. The results of the study will be disseminated through articles in peer-reviewed journals and trade publications, as well as presentations at relevant conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017068164.

Outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy in a suburban tertiary referral centre in Australia over 10 years.

PURPOSE: Outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) is a widely accepted and safe therapeutic option for carefully selected patients. This study reviewed the practice of an OPAT service in a large Australian tertiary teaching hospital in Western Sydney over a 10-year period. METHOD: Data were retrieved from a prospectively maintained electronic database which included information on patient demographics, clinical diagnosis, microbiological identity, antimicrobial therapy, complications and readmissions. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: There were 3435 referrals made to the service between January 2004 and June 2014, amounting to 25,289 antibiotic days. The most frequent referral was for Skin and Soft Tissue Infections (SSTIs), 61.28%, followed by Bone and Joint Infections (BJIs), 15.30%. The most common organism identified was methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus. Readmission was uncommon (5.15%), with the highest rate of readmission noted for Cardiovascular System Infections (16.67%) followed by BJIs (10.31%). Line infection, aseptic thrombophlebitis and drug hypersensitivity or reaction were the cause of 68.55% of all complications. There was a decline in line-related complications throughout the study period. CONCLUSION: OPAT service is in increasing demand in Australia, providing a significant relief in in-hospital days. Growth in referrals was seen not only with SSTIs and BJIs, but also a diverse range of other infective entities with limited literature in its treatment in an OPAT setting. This study highlights the need to improve data collection, develop risk stratification strategies and standardisation of OPAT services in Australia.

Trends and patterns of national antimicrobial consumption in Japan from 2004 to 2016.

Frequent use of broad-spectrum antimicrobial classes has been reported in Japan; however, little is known about the long-term trend of national antimicrobial consumption, and that of individual agents. This study analyzed the national sales data of systemic antimicrobials from 2004 to 2016, derived from the IMS Japan Pharmaceutical Market database, to assess the consumption patterns of antimicrobial classes and agents in Japan. The number of defined daily doses per 1000 inhabitants per day (DID) was calculated for each antimicrobial agent. During the last 13 years, total antimicrobial consumption fluctuated by only 5% around the average of 14.41 DID. In 2016, the most used class was macrolides (32%), followed by cephalosporins (28%) and fluoroquinolones (19%). Oral agents comprised a large proportion (93%) of antimicrobial consumption. The most used agent, clarithromycin, accounted for 25% of all oral compounds used in 2016. The consumption of oral agents with high bioavailability, such as fluoroquinolones, amoxicillin, and sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim increased, whereas that of cephalosporins decreased. In 2016, ceftriaxone was the most consumed parenteral agent, followed by cefazolin. The consumption of parenteral agents increased after 2009 when high-dose regimens of piperacillin/tazobactam, meropenem, and ampicillin/sulbactam were approved by the health insurance system. National antimicrobial consumption has been stable over the last 13 years. Moreover, shifts in the use of agents with high bioavailability and those approved for high-dose regimens were observed. However, the increased use of broad-spectrum agents is worrisome. A multifaceted approach is required to reduce overall antimicrobial consumption.

Antimicrobial utilization in an Iraqi province: a comprehensive evaluation of antibiotic source and cost.

PURPOSE: The aims were to calculate total systemic antibiotic consumption and cost in both public and private sectors in all care settings in Al-Najaf province, Iraq, during 2012, recognize the percentage of each pharmacological class for the dispensed antibiotics and identify oral and parenteral antibiotic percentages dispensed and the portions manufactured nationally and imported. METHODS: Cross-sectional study was conducted in Al-Najaf to calculate the total cost and quantities of antibiotics consumed during 2012 using World Health Organization Guidelines for Defined Daily Dose (DDD). KEY FINDINGS: The results showed more than 21 million DDDs were dispensed in Al-Najaf in one year, and more than half (54.2%) were dispensed by governmental healthcare institutions. A thousand inhabitants in the province consumed 45.26 DDDs per day. Extended-spectrum (34.49%) and combined penicillins (26.08%) were the most frequently consumed while meropenem was the least frequently consumed (0.02%). Ninety-five per cent of the consumed antibiotics were oral dosage forms, and five per cent were parenteral dosage forms. The total cost of antibiotic consumed was more than nine million U.S dollars. CONCLUSIONS: The antibiotic consumption ratio in this province was comparable to neighbouring countries, but far higher compared to European countries. Penicillins, cephalosporins and quinolones were the most popular antibiotics. Around half of the antibiotics consumed were made by national pharmaceutical companies that mainly produce oral antibiotics. The public sector consumed a higher portion, but spent a lower amount compared to private sectors. This is the first time report of antibiotic consumption in Iraq. More studies evaluating antibiotic consumption can improve utilization.

Piperacillin-Tazobactam-induced Adverse Drug Events in Pediatric Patients on Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy.

We report a significantly higher occurrence of adverse events associated with prolonged courses of piperacillin-tazobactam compared with other antibacterial agents used for pediatric outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy. These adverse events were characterized by a constellation of clinical findings including fever, hematologic abnormalities and transaminitis. Adverse events related to piperacillin-tazobactam should be considered in patients who develop a febrile illness associated with a prolonged course of therapy.

Utilization and Toxicity of Alternative Delivery Methods of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Ovarian Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Compared with conventional intravenous platinum and taxane-based chemotherapy for ovarian cancer, both intraperitoneal chemotherapy and more frequent dose-dense intravenous chemotherapy have been associated with improved survival in some studies. We examined the utilization and toxicity of these three methods of chemotherapy delivery in women with ovarian cancer. METHODS: We performed a population-based study and analyzed data on women with ovarian cancer who underwent primary surgery followed by platinum and taxane-based chemotherapy from 2009 to 2013 who were recorded in the MarketScan database. Adjuvant chemotherapy was classified as: intraperitoneal chemotherapy, dose-dense chemotherapy (weekly administration of chemotherapy), or standard chemotherapy (every 3 weeks). Hospitalizations and emergency department visits for chemotherapy-associated complications and costs were recorded and compared using χ tests. RESULTS: A total of 5,892 patients, including 4,135 (70.2%) who received standard chemotherapy, 859 (14.6%) who received intraperitoneal chemotherapy, and 898 (15.2%) treated with dose-dense chemotherapy, were identified. From 2009 to 2013, use of intraperitoneal chemotherapy remained constant (16.3-16.3%), whereas use of dose-dense therapy increased (8.7-18.1%) (P<.001). Hospitalizations for chemotherapy-associated complications occurred in 21.3% of women receiving standard chemotherapy, 34.7% of patients treated with intraperitoneal therapy, and in 25.2% of those receiving dose-dense treatment (P<.001); emergency department visits occurred in 18.3%, 26.3%, and 20.3%, respectively (P<.001). The largest differences in hospitalizations and emergency department visits were seen for gastrointestinal toxicities and electrolyte disorders. The per-patient costs of hospitalization were higher for intraperitoneal chemotherapy than other treatment modalities. CONCLUSION: Intraperitoneal chemotherapy was used in less than 15% of women with ovarian cancer, whereas use of dose-dense chemotherapy is increasing. Although we did not examine survival, intraperitoneal chemotherapy is significantly more toxic than the other methods of treatment.

[Early enteral infussions in complex treatment of severe combined chest trauma].

On the basis of study and treatment of 98 victims it was stated that the absorption of isotonic glucose electrolytes solutions in the small intestine was saved even increased in case of large hemorrhage in severe polytrauma with chest, abdominal injury and other regions trauma. An application of early enteral infusions allowed reducing of the volume of parenteral introduction solutions and facilitated to a reliable decrease of development frequency of nosocomial pneumonia of attributive lethality.

Prediction model for 30-day hospital readmissions among patients discharged receiving outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy.

BACKGROUND: Factors associated with readmission for patients prescribed outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) at hospital discharge have not been definitively identified. The study aim was to develop a model of 30-day readmissions for OPAT patients. METHODS: A database comprising 782 OPAT patients treated between 2009 and 2011 at a single academic center was created. Variables collected included patient demographics, comorbidities, infections, and antibiotic classes. Final model discrimination was assessed using the c-statistic, and calibration was examined graphically. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 58 years (range, 18-95 years), 43% were women, and the most common diagnoses were bacteremia (24%), osteomyelitis (20%), and pyelonephritis (13%). The unplanned 30-day readmission rate was 26%. The leading indications for readmission were non-infection related (30%), worsening infection (29%), and new infection (19%). The final regression model consisted of age (odds ratio [OR], 1.09 per decade; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.99-1.21), aminoglycoside use (OR, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.17-4.57), resistant organisms (OR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.03-2.36), and number of prior hospital discharges without intravenous antibiotics in the past 12 months (OR, 1.20 per prior admission; 95% CI, 1.09-1.32). The c-statistic was 0.61 and the highest-risk quintile of patients had almost a 3-fold higher rate of readmission compared to the lowest. CONCLUSIONS: Patients prescribed OPAT are at risk for readmission. A subgroup of patients at especially high risk can be identified using easily obtainable clinical characteristics at the time of hospital discharge. More intensive interventions to prevent OPAT readmissions should be targeted and tested with those at highest risk.

A comparison of postoperative outcomes utilizing a continuous preperitoneal infusion versus epidural for midline laparotomy.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pain management with a continuous preperitoneal infusion (CPI) for locoregional anesthesia has been shown to have improved postoperative outcomes. This is the first direct comparison of CPI versus epidural infusion (EPI), both in conjunction with systemic analgesia. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of midline laparotomy cases, comparing the use of CPI with systemic patient-controlled analgesia to EPI with systemic patient-controlled analgesia for postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 240 cases from 2007 to 2009 were reviewed. There were 41.3% using CPI and 58.7% with EPI. There were no differences with respect to age, body mass index, or American Society of Anesthesiologists score between CPI and EPI cases. In a multivariate model, total hospital stay was 2 days shorter for the CPI group (P < .001), and the total admission cost was less for CPI (by $6,164; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The use of CPI results in decreased length of hospital stay, decreased number of days with a Foley catheter, and lower hospital costs, compared with EPI use. These findings show that the routine use of CPI for pain management after laparotomy is a safe alternative to EPI.

European Surveillance of Antibiotic Consumption (ESAC) point prevalence survey 2008: paediatric antimicrobial prescribing in 32 hospitals of 21 European countries.

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobials are the most common medicines prescribed to children, but very little is known about patterns of hospital paediatric antimicrobial prescribing. This study aimed at describing paediatric antimicrobial prescribing in European hospitals to identify targets for quality improvement. METHODS: The European Surveillance of Antibiotic Consumption (ESAC) project (www.esac.ua.ac.be) collected data during 2 calendar weeks between May and June 2008 in 32 hospitals of 21 European countries with paediatric departments, using a standardized method. The ESAC point prevalence survey included all inpatient beds and identified all patients who were receiving systemic antimicrobials on the day of the survey or had received antimicrobial surgical prophylaxis on the previous day. RESULTS: Of 1799 children, 583 (32%) received one or more antimicrobials (range 17%-100%). The indications were therapeutic in 71%, prophylactic in 26% and both indications in 3% of patients. The parenteral route was used in 82% of therapeutic indications and in 63% of prophylactic indications. Third-generation cephalosporins were the most prescribed antimicrobials for therapeutic indications (18%). A high proportion of treated children received antimicrobial combinations (37%). The most commonly treated diagnosis site was the respiratory tract for both therapeutic use (30%) and prophylaxis (25%). The duration of surgical prophylaxis was >1 day in 67%. CONCLUSIONS: Targets identified for quality improvement of antimicrobial use in children included excessive use of antimicrobial combinations and a high proportion of parenteral antimicrobials, both of which require further investigation. Surgical prophylaxis for >1 day should also be curbed in order to achieve quality improvement.